Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Rory Stewart cannot escape his seemingly racist colonialist upbringing, no matter how much of a Tory Corbyn they try to sell him as!   Share:  
Thrust of argument: In a comment, in the New Yorker I think, made by Rory Stewart, the Tory party's final desperate attempt to undo all the harm they have done - an attempt to merely copy Corbyn, to produce a leader whom Corbyn's fans may hate slightly less than the other racist corporate whores the Tories, Lib Dem and Blair-Mob have 'offered' us, Stewart joked that the Tory party has gone from Winston Churchill to Bertie Wooster - demonstrating that he, to begin with, has respect for the racist ignorant Churchill, which in this day and age is out of place except among throwbacks, racists and the far right (usually one and the same). Direction of resistance / implied resistance: It also demonstrates that he is far too incapable of self-criticism or criticising his party.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: In fact it has gone from RODERICK SPODE (and people like Churchill) to the drones club dining committee (minus Wooster - no one with a shred of actual integrity has been in any Tory cabinet in my lifetime). Unification: That 'even' Stewart, touted as a 'former left wing' Tory who agrees in his words with what Julian Assange has told us - that 'on the ground' in places we bomb is very very different to what governments and media tell us, is so incapable of the self-critical just nature we all know Corbyn has ought to be another kick in the arse to the Tory psyche - you must understand, you party of sickos, that you have totally lost all capacity to realise what being decent is. Even your best attempt, old Rory Stewart there, comes away disastrously, proving he is as much a racist, deep down, as May, Johnson, Farage and Blair. Sorry Rory - you have to learn to distinguish between Spode and Wooster better - and Wooster and the general membership of the drones club. The very idea that any Tory leader we have had would lay down his life and marry Madeleine Bassett out of honour is a joke. An utter joke. That you are so self-deluded that you could make such a mistake, in public, despite your need for good 'p.r.' demonstrates you're not really pressed to be anti-racist and anti-stupidity. To brand Roderick Spode as Winston Churchill, as you have unconsciously done, Mr Stewart, means that you have failed the Shams test. You are NOT the tory Corbyn, my good man. When one comes I'll let the world know. You are not he, dear boy. You must learn to stop respecting men like Roderick Spode. I know you have been brought up to cheer on Britain and see it as better than the rest of the world. But perhaps you can rise above your primitive grooming/upbringing, lad?!!

Let me re-iterate: Wodehouse portrays crazy patriots as Roderick Spode. Spode preceded Churchill of course. Wodehouse's behaviour during WW2 makes it fairly clear that to him the side of Churchill the people today idolise, the jingoistic Spode-like Churchill which electioneers call upon, was to Wodehouse what he characterises in Spode. It is absurd to pretend, even implicitly (by laughing with Wodehouse at Wooster), that Wodehouse didn't take the piss, emphatically, out of jingoism and theatrical patriotism like Churchill's. Whilst people who attack Wodehouse presumably take Orwell's view that Wodehouse was a fool, remember that Orwell, without a doubt, was 'a snitch'. Just read about what he did to Michael Foot. Honour is in the hands of men like Wodehouse (and Wooster) not Orwell or Churchill. Would Jeeves work for Orwell or Churchill? I very much doubt it.

Stewart's attempt to suggest that Parliament would be best run by Spode shows how deluded Stewart is.

Any Wodehouse fan here ought to accept that Stewart, for all his public relations friendliness, is a fool, an arse, who deep down believes in the greatness of Roderick Spode and scorns Bertie Wooster despite the latter's impressive selfless integrity.

When I attempted to make Stewart aware of this by posting this comment on his facebook page, it was ignored and eventually the account used to post it was banned and 100% censored, removed. So Stewart can pretend that he doesn't need to face this criticism, his 'aides' can even convince him that is the case, but what he needs to know is that this page, on this domain, will be read 100s of 1000s of times during the rest of Stewart's career, unless that career ends very quickly, ie by the next general election outcome! In which case there won't have been time for that many readers to see it.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

3 versions:

1. Server time: 12:19:51 on 16/6/2019
2. Server time: 10:52:20 on 18/6/2019
3. Server time: 21:28:29 on 22/6/2019

Related points:

References:

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

Rory Stewart cannot escape his seemingly racist colonialist upbringing, no matter how much of a Tory Corbyn they try to sell him as!

In a comment, in the New Yorker I think, made by Rory Stewart, the Tory party's final desperate attempt to undo all the harm they have done - an attempt to merely copy Corbyn, to produce a leader whom Corbyn's fans may hate slightly less than the other racist corporate whores the Tories, Lib Dem and Blair-Mob have 'offered' us, Stewart joked that the Tory party has gone from Winston Churchill to Bertie Wooster - demonstrating that he, to begin with, has respect for the racist ignorant Churchill, which in this day and age is out of place except among throwbacks, racists and the far right (usually one and the same).

It also demonstrates that he is far too incapable of self-criticism or criticising his party.

In fact it has gone from RODERICK SPODE (and people like Churchill) to the drones club dining committee (minus Wooster - no one with a shred of actual integrity has been in any Tory cabinet in my lifetime).

That 'even' Stewart, touted as a 'former left wing' Tory who agrees in his words with what Julian Assange has told us - that 'on the ground' in places we bomb is very very different to what governments and media tell us, is so incapable of the self-critical just nature we all know Corbyn has ought to be another kick in the arse to the Tory psyche - you must understand, you party of sickos, that you have totally lost all capacity to realise what being decent is. Even your best attempt, old Rory Stewart there, comes away disastrously, proving he is as much a racist, deep down, as May, Johnson, Farage and Blair. Sorry Rory - you have to learn to distinguish between Spode and Wooster better - and Wooster and the general membership of the drones club. The very idea that any Tory leader we have had would lay down his life and marry Madeleine Bassett out of honour is a joke. An utter joke. That you are so self-deluded that you could make such a mistake, in public, despite your need for good 'p.r.' demonstrates you're not really pressed to be anti-racist and anti-stupidity. To brand Roderick Spode as Winston Churchill, as you have unconsciously done, Mr Stewart, means that you have failed the Shams test. You are NOT the tory Corbyn, my good man. When one comes I'll let the world know. You are not he, dear boy. You must learn to stop respecting men like Roderick Spode. I know you have been brought up to cheer on Britain and see it as better than the rest of the world. But perhaps you can rise above your primitive grooming/upbringing, lad?!!

Let me re-iterate: Wodehouse portrays crazy patriots as Roderick Spode. Spode preceded Churchill of course. Wodehouse's behaviour during WW2 makes it fairly clear that to him the side of Churchill the people today idolise, the jingoistic Spode-like Churchill which electioneers call upon, was to Wodehouse what he characterises in Spode. It is absurd to pretend, even implicitly (by laughing with Wodehouse at Wooster), that Wodehouse didn't take the piss, emphatically, out of jingoism and theatrical patriotism like Churchill's. Whilst people who attack Wodehouse presumably take Orwell's view that Wodehouse was a fool, remember that Orwell, without a doubt, was 'a snitch'. Just read about what he did to Michael Foot. Honour is in the hands of men like Wodehouse (and Wooster) not Orwell or Churchill. Would Jeeves work for Orwell or Churchill? I very much doubt it.

Stewart's attempt to suggest that Parliament would be best run by Spode shows how deluded Stewart is.

Any Wodehouse fan here ought to accept that Stewart, for all his public relations friendliness, is a fool, an arse, who deep down believes in the greatness of Roderick Spode and scorns Bertie Wooster despite the latter's impressive selfless integrity.

When I attempted to make Stewart aware of this by posting this comment on his facebook page, it was ignored and eventually the account used to post it was banned and 100% censored, removed. So Stewart can pretend that he doesn't need to face this criticism, his 'aides' can even convince him that is the case, but what he needs to know is that this page, on this domain, will be read 100s of 1000s of times during the rest of Stewart's career, unless that career ends very quickly, ie by the next general election outcome! In which case there won't have been time for that many readers to see it.