Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Owen Jones' capacity for learning seems weaker than I had imagined (and I hadn't thought much of him, so that's pretty awful).   Share:  
Thrust of argument: The recent events concerning Chris Williamson, who 'claimed' to some extent that the 'anti-semitism' smears thrown at the Labour party are disingenuous and need to be faced responsibly and called out for what they are, has been followed by Owen Jones toeing the (Blair-and-Thatcher)-party line and 'telling off' Williamson etc.

Chomsky points out << "The charges against Chris Williamson are a case in point. There is nothing even remotely anti-semitic in his statement that Labour has 'given too much ground' and been 'too apologetic' in defending its record of addressing 'the scourge of anti-semitism' beyond that of any other party, as he himself had done, on public platforms and in the streets. >>
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Jones has learned nothing at all from the ("numberwang") document in the references below even though it has been around for months already, the opening very clear and pertinent and capable of educating Jones - and whilst hundreds, maybe thousands of people have accessed it and read at least part of it, Jones, whether he has read any of it or not (I'd definitely bet not), has learned nothing from it.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: Over a period of months, Jones, in an average/normal set of (however many) months, is presumably going around in circles patting himself on the back regularly for being so wonderful, never learning one single thing, just constantly improving his ability to put on a neoliberal play-act. Unification: In fact, reader, in a period of a few months almost all of you should be aiming, almost all of the time, to progress, develop, learn, evolve. For people like Jones it seems that 'progress' really means nothing but 'take take take' (from the world). 'Giving' to the world is never seen as 'progress' to such materialistic base minds. Thus learning is something they never feel naturally inclined towards. Your presence, as a reader, at the end of this paragraph, particularly if you reached it by starting at the beginning and journeying along the words all the way, shows you are at least slightly different to those, like Jones, who seem designed to never learn. No need to post references to his attacks on Williamson. I'm sure the popular corporate media will spread the links far and wide and you'll easily find em if you look!

Jones 'attacks' Williamson, an anti-racist, because Jones wants to be seen (by neoliberals and corporatists) to be 'right', whereas Jones would, I suspect, never dare to call Yochanan Gordon racist. Who is Yochanan and why is Jones likely to be afraid that if he calls Yochanan racist he, Jones, will 'suffer', the way Williamson is suffering? This, from my numberwang article:

<<<

<< The Times of Israel is under fire on Friday after publishing a blog post titled 'When Genocide Is Permissible.' The post, written by Yochanon Gordon, was quickly removed from the Times' website, but cached and screen-captured versions of the piece quickly proliferated on social media. >>

The racist blogger wrote: << Hamas has stated forthrightly that it idealizes death as much as Israel celebrates life. What other way then is there to deal with an enemy of this nature other than obliterate them completely? >> (I wonder what the average westerner would feel about that argument's being used in relation to the damage the USA, the UK and much of western Europe has done to the world, for centuries?!!)

Finally this Israeli then declares << If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals? >> (I guess that's what the terrorists who bomb westerners feel they are doing when they commit Israeli-style genocide in Britain, France, the U.S. etc).

>>>

Will Owen Jones make any kind of loud noise about the genocidal racism of Gordon? Nope. I doubt he ever has or will. Yet if attacking Williamson, an anti-racist, will help Jones' career, there he is in the front line, throwing stones at a good man.

Go over the links relating to Chris Williamson in the references below, and digest the Chomsky quote, and you'll find Labour MPs and writers like Owen Jones who insult Holocaust victims by pretending that Chris Williamson is 'anti-semitic' in any way ought to be utterly ashamed of their rancid racist behaviour. That means YOU Yvette Cooper and Stella Creasy, you racist women. Resign right now, you disgusting racists. Your rancid racism is unacceptable. STELLA CREASY, YVETTE COOPER (and plenty of others, but you two really should just get on and resign, you obviously never intend to serve the public) IT IS YOUR TURN TO RESIGN FROM PARLIAMENT - YOU DO NOT SERVE THE PUBLIC. RESIGN NOW. READ THIS: The Blair-led Islamophobes use the pretence of 'anti-semitism', smearing all British muslims (the majority of whom are obviously incensed by Israeli genocide and apartheid), by association, with "anti-semitism" (other than uncle Tommohammeds whom they use as tokens to help them pretend they and their supporters are "not racist") and pandering to the Islamophobes Boris and the Tories and Farage have all pandered to, to win votes from white racist voters. Is Labour ready to pay the same price those guys are paying? This is the most strong and stable time in Labour's history, it seems. Does Corbyn want to risk letting Hodge, who voted to bomb Iraq under Blair, and those like her and Blair take away all that the Labour party has achieved.

And then resign. Because you are unfit for the office you have been given by the people's consent only.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

20 versions:

1. Server time: 13:2:41 on 1/7/2019
2. Server time: 13:10:17 on 1/7/2019
3. Server time: 13:16:48 on 1/7/2019
4. Server time: 13:17:4 on 1/7/2019
5. Server time: 11:27:19 on 3/7/2019
6. Server time: 12:14:13 on 6/7/2019
7. Server time: 12:57:23 on 6/7/2019
8. Server time: 17:37:17 on 6/7/2019
9. Server time: 17:43:50 on 6/7/2019
10. Server time: 11:43:38 on 8/7/2019
11. Server time: 11:46:53 on 8/7/2019
12. Server time: 3:33:39 on 9/7/2019
13. Server time: 3:35:0 on 9/7/2019
14. Server time: 3:54:0 on 9/7/2019
15. Server time: 4:20:26 on 9/7/2019
16. Server time: 4:22:27 on 9/7/2019
17. Server time: 4:25:33 on 9/7/2019
18. Server time: 22:6:14 on 10/7/2019
19. Server time: 0:34:41 on 11/7/2019
20. Server time: 13:11:58 on 12/7/2019

Related points:

References:

Read this, Jones: http://opinion.tvhobo.com/owenjones_israel_numberwang.html

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/chomsky-speaks-out-against-the-attacks-on-chris-williamson


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q3MkjqLDnLn2Ii5pp7__J-AQ83_aK0NX/view/
https://off-guardian.org/2019/07/09/guardian-deletes-open-letter-defending-chris-williamson/
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jul/08/jewish-support-for-chris-williamson
https://skwawkbox.org/[..]hatchet-job-is-embarrassingly-thin-misdirection

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

Owen Jones' capacity for learning seems weaker than I had imagined (and I hadn't thought much of him, so that's pretty awful).

The recent events concerning Chris Williamson, who 'claimed' to some extent that the 'anti-semitism' smears thrown at the Labour party are disingenuous and need to be faced responsibly and called out for what they are, has been followed by Owen Jones toeing the (Blair-and-Thatcher)-party line and 'telling off' Williamson etc.

Chomsky points out << "The charges against Chris Williamson are a case in point. There is nothing even remotely anti-semitic in his statement that Labour has 'given too much ground' and been 'too apologetic' in defending its record of addressing 'the scourge of anti-semitism' beyond that of any other party, as he himself had done, on public platforms and in the streets. >>

Jones has learned nothing at all from the ("numberwang") document in the references below even though it has been around for months already, the opening very clear and pertinent and capable of educating Jones - and whilst hundreds, maybe thousands of people have accessed it and read at least part of it, Jones, whether he has read any of it or not (I'd definitely bet not), has learned nothing from it.

Over a period of months, Jones, in an average/normal set of (however many) months, is presumably going around in circles patting himself on the back regularly for being so wonderful, never learning one single thing, just constantly improving his ability to put on a neoliberal play-act.

In fact, reader, in a period of a few months almost all of you should be aiming, almost all of the time, to progress, develop, learn, evolve. For people like Jones it seems that 'progress' really means nothing but 'take take take' (from the world). 'Giving' to the world is never seen as 'progress' to such materialistic base minds. Thus learning is something they never feel naturally inclined towards. Your presence, as a reader, at the end of this paragraph, particularly if you reached it by starting at the beginning and journeying along the words all the way, shows you are at least slightly different to those, like Jones, who seem designed to never learn. No need to post references to his attacks on Williamson. I'm sure the popular corporate media will spread the links far and wide and you'll easily find em if you look!

Jones 'attacks' Williamson, an anti-racist, because Jones wants to be seen (by neoliberals and corporatists) to be 'right', whereas Jones would, I suspect, never dare to call Yochanan Gordon racist. Who is Yochanan and why is Jones likely to be afraid that if he calls Yochanan racist he, Jones, will 'suffer', the way Williamson is suffering? This, from my numberwang article:

<<<

<< The Times of Israel is under fire on Friday after publishing a blog post titled 'When Genocide Is Permissible.' The post, written by Yochanon Gordon, was quickly removed from the Times' website, but cached and screen-captured versions of the piece quickly proliferated on social media. >>

The racist blogger wrote: << Hamas has stated forthrightly that it idealizes death as much as Israel celebrates life. What other way then is there to deal with an enemy of this nature other than obliterate them completely? >> (I wonder what the average westerner would feel about that argument's being used in relation to the damage the USA, the UK and much of western Europe has done to the world, for centuries?!!)

Finally this Israeli then declares << If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals? >> (I guess that's what the terrorists who bomb westerners feel they are doing when they commit Israeli-style genocide in Britain, France, the U.S. etc).

>>>

Will Owen Jones make any kind of loud noise about the genocidal racism of Gordon? Nope. I doubt he ever has or will. Yet if attacking Williamson, an anti-racist, will help Jones' career, there he is in the front line, throwing stones at a good man.

Go over the links relating to Chris Williamson in the references below, and digest the Chomsky quote, and you'll find Labour MPs and writers like Owen Jones who insult Holocaust victims by pretending that Chris Williamson is 'anti-semitic' in any way ought to be utterly ashamed of their rancid racist behaviour. That means YOU Yvette Cooper and Stella Creasy, you racist women. Resign right now, you disgusting racists. Your rancid racism is unacceptable. STELLA CREASY, YVETTE COOPER (and plenty of others, but you two really should just get on and resign, you obviously never intend to serve the public) IT IS YOUR TURN TO RESIGN FROM PARLIAMENT - YOU DO NOT SERVE THE PUBLIC. RESIGN NOW. READ THIS: The Blair-led Islamophobes use the pretence of 'anti-semitism', smearing all British muslims (the majority of whom are obviously incensed by Israeli genocide and apartheid), by association, with "anti-semitism" (other than uncle Tommohammeds whom they use as tokens to help them pretend they and their supporters are "not racist") and pandering to the Islamophobes Boris and the Tories and Farage have all pandered to, to win votes from white racist voters. Is Labour ready to pay the same price those guys are paying? This is the most strong and stable time in Labour's history, it seems. Does Corbyn want to risk letting Hodge, who voted to bomb Iraq under Blair, and those like her and Blair take away all that the Labour party has achieved.

And then resign. Because you are unfit for the office you have been given by the people's consent only.



Read this, Jones: http://opinion.tvhobo.com/owenjones_israel_numberwang.html

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/chomsky-speaks-out-against-the-attacks-on-chris-williamson


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q3MkjqLDnLn2Ii5pp7__J-AQ83_aK0NX/view/
https://off-guardian.org/2019/07/09/guardian-deletes-open-letter-defending-chris-williamson/
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jul/08/jewish-support-for-chris-williamson
https://skwawkbox.org/[..]hatchet-job-is-embarrassingly-thin-misdirection