Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

A speculation about Mark Field.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: In the room, he was there, and only those in it who weren't in his way were in it - this is my theory. For some reason it was some (perhaps one of many, regular) good moment for him, some new small 'victory' within the private sphere of his work and play. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: And then some 'stupid woman' came and was ruining it and he had to remove her.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: Normally, within that sphere, since totalitarianism is essentially the law INSIDE any corporation or similar private grouping of people, his way of removing obstacles was, through words and financial actions (hirings and firings, snubbings and social beatings - among himself and all present there - all subject to the same jungle law, totalitarian law inside the world of private concentrated power) exactly what we saw turned into physical action. Unification: In other words, for the simple, he overlooked the fact that the activist was not one of his 'tribe' and treated her by internal tribal rules instead of those genuinely acceptable to extra-tribal 'law' (the spirit of our laws and the unspoken morality of people everywhere, albeit outside of corporations and totalitarian frameworks like them).

Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe, as the Blues Traveler music group sings, I'm right. We all know that inside the average 'big company' the display of brutal forceful control we saw in Mark Field is part of the environment every day - not of being physically removed (although 'security' CAN do that to you any time, of course, ANY OF YOU who may work in such places) but financially and hierarchically controlled. There's always someone above you, and what they say is law. Field reminded us of that. Those still trapped in the corporate world, my sincere condolences to you. I hope you are well. Drop in when you get out - whenever you're finally free. Assuming you have no time before then ever - which is a fair assumption. One only needs to be a mathematician to be very clear on that.

I gather Mark Field has claimed that he was scared of terrorists. That's right Mark, instead of admitting "I overreacted and committed an unnecessary violent physical act on a harmless individual" stick to the whole "what happened here today is the fault of Muslims, and Jeremy Corbyn" line. Who would disbelieve you?

Reader, in the link below from "Conservative Friends of Israel" you can see Mark Field telling Hamas to "renounce violence". Mark, I feel YOU need to renounce violence. Violent men like Mark are the vanguard of those who 'defend' Israel and its immoral and illegal violence, reader. Take a good look at Conservative Friend of Israel Mark Field. He embodies the values of the Israeli state today, of Trump, of Netanyahu - his violence against that Greenpeace activist, which he then blamed on muslims, the way the Israeli state blames its violence on muslims. You are an utter numpty, Mark. Renounce your violence.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

6 versions:

1. Server time: 14:6:51 on 24/6/2019
2. Server time: 14:11:11 on 24/6/2019
3. Server time: 14:17:8 on 24/6/2019
4. Server time: 15:41:43 on 24/6/2019
5. Server time: 15:42:44 on 24/6/2019
6. Server time: 11:36:36 on 3/7/2019

Related points:

References:

https://cfoi.co.uk/fco-minister-mark-field-hamas-must-renounce-violence-and-recognise-israel/

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

A speculation about Mark Field.

In the room, he was there, and only those in it who weren't in his way were in it - this is my theory. For some reason it was some (perhaps one of many, regular) good moment for him, some new small 'victory' within the private sphere of his work and play.

And then some 'stupid woman' came and was ruining it and he had to remove her.

Normally, within that sphere, since totalitarianism is essentially the law INSIDE any corporation or similar private grouping of people, his way of removing obstacles was, through words and financial actions (hirings and firings, snubbings and social beatings - among himself and all present there - all subject to the same jungle law, totalitarian law inside the world of private concentrated power) exactly what we saw turned into physical action.

In other words, for the simple, he overlooked the fact that the activist was not one of his 'tribe' and treated her by internal tribal rules instead of those genuinely acceptable to extra-tribal 'law' (the spirit of our laws and the unspoken morality of people everywhere, albeit outside of corporations and totalitarian frameworks like them).

Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe, as the Blues Traveler music group sings, I'm right. We all know that inside the average 'big company' the display of brutal forceful control we saw in Mark Field is part of the environment every day - not of being physically removed (although 'security' CAN do that to you any time, of course, ANY OF YOU who may work in such places) but financially and hierarchically controlled. There's always someone above you, and what they say is law. Field reminded us of that. Those still trapped in the corporate world, my sincere condolences to you. I hope you are well. Drop in when you get out - whenever you're finally free. Assuming you have no time before then ever - which is a fair assumption. One only needs to be a mathematician to be very clear on that.

I gather Mark Field has claimed that he was scared of terrorists. That's right Mark, instead of admitting "I overreacted and committed an unnecessary violent physical act on a harmless individual" stick to the whole "what happened here today is the fault of Muslims, and Jeremy Corbyn" line. Who would disbelieve you?

Reader, in the link below from "Conservative Friends of Israel" you can see Mark Field telling Hamas to "renounce violence". Mark, I feel YOU need to renounce violence. Violent men like Mark are the vanguard of those who 'defend' Israel and its immoral and illegal violence, reader. Take a good look at Conservative Friend of Israel Mark Field. He embodies the values of the Israeli state today, of Trump, of Netanyahu - his violence against that Greenpeace activist, which he then blamed on muslims, the way the Israeli state blames its violence on muslims. You are an utter numpty, Mark. Renounce your violence.



https://cfoi.co.uk/fco-minister-mark-field-hamas-must-renounce-violence-and-recognise-israel/