Thrust of argument: It's in these lyrics by Amy Macdonald:
"I don't care
Who does her hair or
What clothes she wears
I don't care if it's YSL. I don't care if it's Chanel
What matters to me is a strong belief
All this beauty is skin deep
Don't care about hair, don't care about eyes
It's about what's inside
You'll never know who you'll meet on you way to the top
You'll probably see them again when your fame starts to drop
Down down, I'll meet you on the ground
It's no good with your hair and your shiny blue eyes
It's no good when you finally start to realize
I need something more
This pretty face don't work no more
What happened to achieving
What happened to believing in yourself
Why listen to the musings of someone, somebody else
I'm sorry I don't see and I can't quite believe it anymore
What happened to believing that beauty's in the eye of the beholder".
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: One of my good friends has seen Amy busking away, in her youth.
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 472.00
bt AT APPROX 237.00
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 179.35
hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 469.70
icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 609.00
sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 699.40
standardlife AT APPROX 392.00
taylorwimpey AT APPROX 190.40
vodafone AT APPROX 203.00
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: So it sounds to me like her lyrics are very 'true', not words spoken without understanding what she's saying.
Unification: Of course, one should not rule out listening to the musings of others before musing some more for oneself and coming to one's own conclusions. Otherwise why would I listen to Amy's song? Obviously. But there is such a thing as demagoguery - a problem, not just a silly-sound-related joke made in a Fry and Laurie sketch.
Feynman said in a few places, very emphatically, that it doesn't matter who you are or what your name is or your title or your bank account or what your friends say you're like or anything else, what matters, in science, when judging the truth of your theory, is what the data shows, whether what you say agrees with experiment/experience - on the part of the persons judging. If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong - it's as simple as that. There, in a nutshell, Feynman has told us, is the key to science. If it disagrees with experiment it's wrong. It can call itself Prime Minister or King of the World or anything else, it can wear flares, a grey suit, tweed, a burka, a g-string, a hawaiian shirt, a bandana, anything it likes, that makes no difference. If it disagrees with experiment/experience/testing, it's wrong.
Maybe another way to put it, which may be helpful for the people trapped in the conditions of our post-Feynman times, is this: TEST IDEAS TO FIND OUT IF THEY ARE TRUE. It's really not that much to ask. Billions have no access to toilets. To change this you have to be more honest, particularly intellectually speaking - ie honest in your mind, about what you call true and false, what you are lazy about and don't make any effort about. From consumer decisions to lazy political support for things like genocide, destruction of nations to loot them, and many even worse, even sicker things, the evidence of which is now higher than mount Olympus could ever pretend it is.
What is 'the scientific method'?
Well, I recommend you go and study the videos and writings recording the direct words of Richard Feynman about that and other matters. His opinions on NASA and Hiroshima are of vital importance also, in my opinion.