Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Some apparently believe that food and sex are the two toughest habits to change.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: In other words what food you eat and indeed how much, and the same with sex. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Someone told me this, but gave no substantiation or reference.

 

I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bae (at half strength)
AT APPROX 565.00 capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 486.20 centrica AT APPROX 145.00 directline AT APPROX 358.70 g4s AT APPROX 252.90 gkn AT APPROX 298.40 glencore AT APPROX 343.00 m&s AT APPROX 319.30 rollsroyce (at half strength)
AT APPROX 839.50 rsa (at half strength)
AT APPROX 601.00 standardlife AT APPROX 417.90

THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: It is an intriguing question, the question of whether or not that is the case. Unification: The hyperconsumerism and hypersexuality of modern society is a systematic flaw, but technically individuals could change that, but for the problem of will power itself.

Those producing all the nonsense would find themselves in hot water, in terms of economic survival, if the population actually improved its ability to live better lives and to have will power able to resist the call from advertising, presence and peer pressure to abandon that at any point in favour of more mindless and often potentially harmful consumerism.

This must be discussed. People must face up to their individual responsibility, each and every person, from the young to the old - for it is never too late to change.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 19:49:34 on 24/11/2017

Related points:

References:

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.