NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".
War mongers must resign from Labour. Labour activists who don't call out war mongers are deceitful two-faced snakes - no better than those they try to convince others to reject.
Thrust of argument: Stop The War wrote 'Jeremy Corbyn, frontrunner to be the next leader of the Labour Party, and the national chair of Stop the War Coalition, has said that, if he becomes leader, he will issue an apology on behalf of Labour for the illegal Iraq war.
In this interview with Channel 4 News, Stop the War convenor Lindsey German says Jeremy Corbyn's proposal that Labour be held to account for the Iraq war will be popular and is the right thing to do'.
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Corbyn must follow this through fully.
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bae (at half strength)
AT APPROX 565.00
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 486.20
centrica AT APPROX 145.00
directline AT APPROX 358.70
g4s AT APPROX 252.90
gkn AT APPROX 298.40
glencore AT APPROX 343.00
m&s AT APPROX 319.30
rollsroyce (at half strength)
AT APPROX 839.50
rsa (at half strength)
AT APPROX 601.00
standardlife AT APPROX 417.90
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: Labour MPs who defy this mandate must be politically punished.
Unification: There is no room for arms dealers and genocide-backers. All MPs, Conservative, Labour and anyone else, must embrace a civilised set of ethics or resign from Parliament. Immoral people should not be MPs.
(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns)
previous point on the grid | next point on the grid
Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.