Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

<< our goal is that we are interested in reducing the likelihood of such crimes whether they are against us or against someone else >>   Share:  
Thrust of argument: <<

Assume 2 Conditions for this Talk

I'm going to assume 2 conditions for this talk.

- The first one is just what I assume to be recognition of fact. That is that the events of September 11 were a horrendous atrocity probably the most devastating instant human toll of any crime in history, outside of war.

- The second assumption has to do with the goals. I'm assuming that our goal is that we are interested in reducing the likelihood of such crimes whether they are against us or against someone else.

If you don't accept those two assumptions, then what I say will not be addressed to you. If we do accept them, then a number of questions arise, closely related ones, which merit a good deal of thought.

>>
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: That's a vital Noam Chomsky quote.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: What follows it is also vital. Unification: For now, read it via the link in the references below. Myself I watched the video of it around the same time it was spoken by Chomsky himself.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 0:29:13 on 8/3/2020

Related points:

References:

https://chomsky.info/20011018-2/

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

<< our goal is that we are interested in reducing the likelihood of such crimes whether they are against us or against someone else >>

<<

Assume 2 Conditions for this Talk

I'm going to assume 2 conditions for this talk.

- The first one is just what I assume to be recognition of fact. That is that the events of September 11 were a horrendous atrocity probably the most devastating instant human toll of any crime in history, outside of war.

- The second assumption has to do with the goals. I'm assuming that our goal is that we are interested in reducing the likelihood of such crimes whether they are against us or against someone else.

If you don't accept those two assumptions, then what I say will not be addressed to you. If we do accept them, then a number of questions arise, closely related ones, which merit a good deal of thought.

>>

That's a vital Noam Chomsky quote.

What follows it is also vital.

For now, read it via the link in the references below. Myself I watched the video of it around the same time it was spoken by Chomsky himself.



https://chomsky.info/20011018-2/