Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

'Whiteness' is an arbitrary mutation in humans.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: 'White' skin has only been on 'European' bodies for a few thousand years, before which they were the same as many people they call 'black', eg 'Hispanic', 'Asian', 'African' etc. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: The mutation which led to whiter skin survived in cultures where agricultural practises lowered vitamin D intake and white skin absorbed vitamin D from the sun much faster.

 

Read about a low-risk "end of day" trading method designed for long and stable periods of economic activity.

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: This is not a strength or weakness, it's a factor with context and which in the modern day is meaningless. Unification: There is nothing 'better' or for that matter 'worse' about 'white' skin and the histories taught about it are more hilarious than old testament accounts of the conception of space time.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 12:51:1 on 19/7/2017

Related points:

References:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/07/where-did-white-people-come-from/
http://www.ruthlesscriticism.com/where_does_racism_come_from.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caepDj0udmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q71DWYJD-dI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gq77rOuZck

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22