Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

<< Moreover, Sanders almost always introduces support for Palestinians by professing devotion to Israel's security and right to exist. He has a long history of funding Israeli war crimes. (His claim that he'll condition aid to Israel on a better human rights record is a sucker's bet; Sanders has had three decades to apply that principle.) All the candidates are Zionist. I don't care to parse the nuances of their Zionism. Finding - or, worse, celebrating - a kinder colonizer is a waste of time. >>   Share:  
Thrust of argument: The psychology of the rich of Wimbledon, who are the key example of all rich Tory voters in England, is easy for me to fathom, having spent some time here recently. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: They are gleeful that they have impoverished loads of 'dumb' white racist northerners, in order to enrich themselves. Those racist northerners (not actually any more racist than these filth I mention in Wimbledon - not the entirety of the population of Wimbledon but the bulk of its tory voters, and those like em in Chelsea and other rich London Tory-minority-held areas {in London Tories are the minority, severely}) voted for Johnson on the basis of his dog-whistle politics, his Islamophobia and general Trumplike ass-wipe nature. Indeed Boris's hair even LOOKS like toilet roll, used at that.

So these rich white Tory racists are PLEASED at having conned loads of other white tory/blairite racists into voting for Johnson and enriching the rich, they are gleeful that he has already robbed those very voters, the northern white racists, of money, for the benefit of the rich white tory racists who voted for Johnson too, and make intellectually dishonest excuses to gloss over Johnson's resounding racism.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: So you see rich white tories CONNED loads of poor white blairite/tories into losing their money to the rich white tories. Unification: Labour is a tad different, eh? Many decent tories and others backed Labour in the Corbyn election. As for Labour - many rich Londoners joined with Corbyn and tried to save the finances of England's poor, including the finances of the white racists in the north who voted for Johnson, who were robbed by Johnson and by the rich white London tory racists who are laughing at the northerners they robbed by conning them into voting with them.

Labour's vote was unity, it was an act of unity, ALL who voted Labour this election were a unified force who believed sincerely in the same principles of fairness and decency, of civilised society.

This sums it up.

As for Sanders, what Counterpunch says is very true. It is worth facing that - what will happen in the USA in the end is no different to this example I have given - ie the rich white Donald Trumps will con all the poor white provincial and other voters - and if not the Donald Trumps, then one way or another the Clintons, even if they use, in the end, "Bernie", as a puppet or fig leaf.

Given his failure to make a genuinely noble stand on Palestine, Bernie can hardly really be trusted any more than Tom Watson could, eh? Still, you're entitled to pretend, as you face judgment, that you are not guilty, even if you will be found guilty.

The blood of Palestinians is what American guilt is written in. It is written every day, in fresh writing.

I suggest Americans and British/European bitches who grovel to and kneel before American corporations read the document in the references below.

Here's another good quote from it:

<<

Was Sanders fighting for Palestinian rights when he fondly recalled living on a kibbutz (in other words, a racialized settlement)? When he voted in favor of a Senate resolution (introduced by Mitch McConnell) that recognizes Jerusalem as Israel's undivided capital? When he yelled at constituents protesting the war crimes Israel was committing with weapons he voted to provide? When he fired a campaign staffer for criticizing Netanyahu? When he went on a Zionist diatribe in an interview with a Palestinian journalist? When he blamed an Israeli massacre of 50 civilians on "Hamas"? When he suggested that Palestinian parents train their children to become suicide bombers?

>>
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

6 versions:

1. Server time: 17:36:11 on 13/2/2020
2. Server time: 17:38:1 on 13/2/2020
3. Server time: 17:38:25 on 13/2/2020
4. Server time: 17:39:14 on 13/2/2020
5. Server time: 9:45:57 on 14/2/2020
6. Server time: 9:48:52 on 14/2/2020

Related points:

References:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/02/13/how-bernie-sanders-became-a-fighter-for-palestine/

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

<< Moreover, Sanders almost always introduces support for Palestinians by professing devotion to Israel's security and right to exist. He has a long history of funding Israeli war crimes. (His claim that he'll condition aid to Israel on a better human rights record is a sucker's bet; Sanders has had three decades to apply that principle.) All the candidates are Zionist. I don't care to parse the nuances of their Zionism. Finding - or, worse, celebrating - a kinder colonizer is a waste of time. >>

The psychology of the rich of Wimbledon, who are the key example of all rich Tory voters in England, is easy for me to fathom, having spent some time here recently.

They are gleeful that they have impoverished loads of 'dumb' white racist northerners, in order to enrich themselves. Those racist northerners (not actually any more racist than these filth I mention in Wimbledon - not the entirety of the population of Wimbledon but the bulk of its tory voters, and those like em in Chelsea and other rich London Tory-minority-held areas {in London Tories are the minority, severely}) voted for Johnson on the basis of his dog-whistle politics, his Islamophobia and general Trumplike ass-wipe nature. Indeed Boris's hair even LOOKS like toilet roll, used at that.

So these rich white Tory racists are PLEASED at having conned loads of other white tory/blairite racists into voting for Johnson and enriching the rich, they are gleeful that he has already robbed those very voters, the northern white racists, of money, for the benefit of the rich white tory racists who voted for Johnson too, and make intellectually dishonest excuses to gloss over Johnson's resounding racism.

So you see rich white tories CONNED loads of poor white blairite/tories into losing their money to the rich white tories.

Labour is a tad different, eh? Many decent tories and others backed Labour in the Corbyn election. As for Labour - many rich Londoners joined with Corbyn and tried to save the finances of England's poor, including the finances of the white racists in the north who voted for Johnson, who were robbed by Johnson and by the rich white London tory racists who are laughing at the northerners they robbed by conning them into voting with them.

Labour's vote was unity, it was an act of unity, ALL who voted Labour this election were a unified force who believed sincerely in the same principles of fairness and decency, of civilised society.

This sums it up.

As for Sanders, what Counterpunch says is very true. It is worth facing that - what will happen in the USA in the end is no different to this example I have given - ie the rich white Donald Trumps will con all the poor white provincial and other voters - and if not the Donald Trumps, then one way or another the Clintons, even if they use, in the end, "Bernie", as a puppet or fig leaf.

Given his failure to make a genuinely noble stand on Palestine, Bernie can hardly really be trusted any more than Tom Watson could, eh? Still, you're entitled to pretend, as you face judgment, that you are not guilty, even if you will be found guilty.

The blood of Palestinians is what American guilt is written in. It is written every day, in fresh writing.

I suggest Americans and British/European bitches who grovel to and kneel before American corporations read the document in the references below.

Here's another good quote from it:

<<

Was Sanders fighting for Palestinian rights when he fondly recalled living on a kibbutz (in other words, a racialized settlement)? When he voted in favor of a Senate resolution (introduced by Mitch McConnell) that recognizes Jerusalem as Israel's undivided capital? When he yelled at constituents protesting the war crimes Israel was committing with weapons he voted to provide? When he fired a campaign staffer for criticizing Netanyahu? When he went on a Zionist diatribe in an interview with a Palestinian journalist? When he blamed an Israeli massacre of 50 civilians on "Hamas"? When he suggested that Palestinian parents train their children to become suicide bombers?

>>



https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/02/13/how-bernie-sanders-became-a-fighter-for-palestine/