Removal of resistance: England hates London and Corbyn and non white people.
Unification: We have reached a moment where tectonic plates have collided. Scotland didn't really reject Corbyn (since the SNP shares the bulk of his policies), Scotland rejected England. Now Scotland will vote to be its own nation state. A nation state with the policies of Jeremy Corbyn, a fully independent state which has entrenched Corbyn's policies, the ones he and the SNP share, for a long time in its establishment. The man and his popularity outside London is not what Scotland was ever interested in, only his policies and those of leaders like him.
We need not fear. A Corbyn-led anti-racist Britain is an absurd childish pipe dream. Sorry little Englanders, you can protest all you like but most of little England's population are racists, and protesting them won't change them, Scotland has their number, these Islamophobes won't be changing any time soon.
But an anti-racist Corbynland, named Scotland, where the policies are no different to those of Corbyn and Milne and Cockburn and so on and so forth, to quote Feynman (!), is moments away.
The goons have opened the door to it. How can Scotland stand side by side with Boris Johnson's Little England?
It'll be horrifying, of course, if that too is an overly optimistic view of the degree Corbyn-like philosophy exists in Scotland. I know Scots who are as goonish as Blair and Bojo, and I know Scots who probably taught Corbyn's teachers how to be what makes Corbyn Corbyn and them them.
FEAR NOT me hearties! Corbynland is even closer now.
What fools we were to imagine we could make one using an island full of Little Englanders who hate everything about this evolved plan, one so well laid out in Corbyn's manifesto.
But Scotland has qualities which make it ripe - Max Keiser predicted it long ago and I thought it was absurd, that Scotland could become a world leader state almost overnight as a result of independence.
I think the answer to Vijay Prashad's question about how we let the British colonize India is actually there, in the parts of Britain outside Little England, and I say 'we' loosely, as it was the dravidian Indian which essentially fell, and the lands of Pashtuns, for example, and the sorts of cultures which led to my own personal ancestors, one way or another, on one or other fringe - were never colonized by the British. Last time they tried was 2001, and it's 2020 soon and they're talking about whether or not to carry on invading that zone and continuing to try to conquer it. Whether or not they choose to carry on (being arseholes) or not doesn't seem as relevant as the fact that even now it remains untaken by them, even with their 'advanced' militaries and nukes and big press systems and gigantic slave workforces - even now a few geezers and geezerettes in mountains are 'too tough' for this remorselessly militant and invasive society to 'take'.
When the world's environment has been all but destroyed by Western Fraggles, and almost no humans are alive, as a 'speculator' I would bet money that somewhere in the mountainside of Afghanistan humanity will continue and move to the next generation and one day build back up to a vast global civilisation. Don't worry. It's not just about people without "funny tinges"! There are others who may survive even if you don't!
However, Scotland has mountains too. And a lot of clever people. And it will clearly not break off its relationship with the rest of the "European Union" or pander to petty xenophobic mob mentality, in my opinion.
But as I said, I think that without Scotland, Little England is really just a thug land, by the look of it. And of course it is. What is the 'difference' between them? When you look back at that, the whole thing is obvious. Who stole what from who? Who is an invasive thug and who is a planet-nurturing being nurturing what was always theirs and only going out and being imperialist as a result of having been conquered by imperialists, rather like roman slaves. Scotland, then, is like an entire slave country within the Roman Empire, right next to Rome.
Either way, it was a DREAM to imagine England can be like that - but is it really so hard for Scotland? In Scotland the Blairites are outnumbered by united nationalists and the real left wing. In England, by contrast, the real left wing is hugely outnumbered by colonialist right wing and Blairite neoliberals. A free Scotland would not only enshrine Corbynism - in whatever name it wants - for the rest of human history in an entire nation state, it would destroy Blair and the neoliberals permanently, and force Westminster to become a battle between Tory Corbyn and Tory Trump. It would end the party system and open the door to amazing new independent candidates, coalitions, alliances and leaderships, you may see Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister yet, leading a group of 450 independent candidates allied by a climate policy, for example.
When you shoot down someone carrying an important idea, the idea spreads all over the land you shoot it down over, and becomes much more powerful than it was when merely in flight.
SNP's red line on Trident spells the end of Little England's undemocratic dominance over the policies of this entire nation. When the referendum comes in Scotland, vote against Tony Blair, my Scottish sisters and brothers, vote against Tony Blair, even if they use Jeremy Corbyn to try and sell Tony to you. No doubt he'll resign before being forced to do THAT.
You have sent a clear message to Tony Blair, now send one to the rest of Little England. Be free, and finish the job of making a Corbyn Wonderland. You take the high road and I'll take the low road. Land of the Hobo, open the gates, so that the weary my come 'home'.