Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

In among the chaos of American soldiers, trapped in a gory nightmare, there is Captain Willard, hunting monsters in the jungles.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: Make of it what you will. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: There's a lot to read.


Read about a low-risk "end of day" trading method designed for long and stable periods of economic activity.


Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:


Removal of resistance: Don't pause here, click the links and read it all. Unification: As far as I know, Chomsky is usually right. If you want to ask yourself what the crux of this issue is about, think about those Kurds, and also think about the actual nature of the Assad government, going back many many years - whatever the situation may be with regard to imperial intervention.

Without a doubt a cessation of violence throughout Syria and the world at the earliest opportunity is what I think is the number one priority, whatever else is the case, or isn't.

Pepe Escobar's esteemed opinion on the matter is this: "Condemning Sultan Erdogan is one thing.

Yet, for all practical purposes, Chomsky, David Harvey and Judith Butler, among others, are supporting the ILLEGAL presence and shady ops by Pentagon, CIA and assorted usual suspects in sovereign Syrian territory."
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns


Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

4 versions:

1. Server time: 2:17:2 on 27/4/2018
2. Server time: 11:38:8 on 27/4/2018
3. Server time: 12:32:47 on 27/4/2018
4. Server time: 15:58:59 on 1/5/2018

Related points:





previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid


Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22