Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Clarity vs 'persuasion'.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: TVhobo's new, growing, browsable index of phrases and keywords which lead to urls which may be quite relevant to those words and to grid points which may also be quite relevant to those words is part of a scheme to provide more and more and more clarity to users worldwide - enabling them to pin down ideas, facts, etc etc - with reference to more and more existing information. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: What the 'mainstream media' and corporate-captured 'establishment' (the unholy corporate-state nexus, in short) seeks to do is to persuade and never clarify - whether it is the advertiser who knows better than you, enough to not tell you that as well as getting lots of sex and cars you'll also get obese and maybe even get cancer, because of the thing they are 'persuading' you to do - or whether it is the nannying MP or journalist, or even your local nurse consultant standing in for a legitimate doctor at the walk-in center - holding back information from you which you are not 'responsible enough' to handle is common practise for these self-proclaimed ubermenschen.


Read about a low-risk "end of day" trading method designed for long and stable periods of economic activity.


Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:


Removal of resistance: TVhobo is trying to do the opposite - to show you what you need to see to go and find out the truth for yourself - whether about the idiocy of your daily hyperconsumerism or the genocidal evil of those people you have allowed, through your passivity, to be your masters. Unification: Clarity, not persuasion, is the name of the policy. And it's not a game. So it's not the name of any game. Bernays-fed hierarchists are the ones who play games. We, here, need to deal in facts, reality, truth, really existing possibilities for progress, really existing progress.

The phrase 'really existing' which I have heard Chomsky use is a useful one - ie you can talk about 'science' vs 'really-existing science' (a discipline used to make people fat, diseased, likely to die from radiation - has a lot of cheek pretending it is a guardian of truth and progress!!!)
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns


Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 10:52:56 on 2/3/2018

Related points:




previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid


Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22