Home   |         NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

"The complexity of language which you have to learn when you learn a language is almost entirely externalisation" (Chomsky).   Share:  
Thrust of argument: In that nutshell (read a longer extract concerning the matter via the link in the references below, and references on that link) lies the problem with the so-called 'west' today. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: The reason idiots like, for example, Alistair Campbell or Robert Webb or Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton are 'up themselves', (a list of 10,000 people could be made right here right now, but why? You can extrapolate) is that they have been taught to see the complexity of communicated/external language as a great evolutionary trait, and to measure their own 'worth' and 'survivability' in terms of their capacity to learn by rote all sorts of theoretically needlessly complex forms.

 

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: There must be a hundred different ways in which I can try to explain that problem without there being at least a majority of readers who still do not get it. Unification: Read the Chomsky. That's the best way to be sure you may manage to comprehend the real nature of the organisation of your mind.

I was reading through what I wrote about the 'numberwangers' earlier and noticed this: << How much of the media, of big companies, and small ones, of the people you meet everywhere, important and unimportant, onscreen and off it, are not actually mediocre when it comes to their capacity to be intelligent, to be honest, to be diligent, to be thorough, to be on the case like Rumpole, to be facing the truth like the Pythons, to be true to the spirit like Briers and Kendall and Eddington and Keith? How many of them are, instead, in fact, weak minded, weak willed, servants of narcissism and any tyrant who can open a door for them to some comfort? >>

In fact it is me, more than 99% or 100% of readers who can understand what I'm saying there. If you ARE mediocre you have nothing to measure by and do not know you are mediocre. The nature of the document as, primarily, self-communication, before any other form of communication, says much about reality which most of you miss.

On top of everything else it says this: that if you are truly 'enlightened' then your chief audience is yourself, so your object is only ever to disseminate truth in total correspondence to all internal organisation of your mind. You are "intellectually honest".

Thus anyone who takes as an a priori the need for 'p.r.' and basic dishonesty, of any sort, most of the time - is tending away from evolved, not in the direction of evolution.

This is the majority of humans in our times. The misunderstanding over language which the Chomsky quotes draw attention to is key to you, reader, if you want to be one of the ones to evolve, asap.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

3 versions:

1. Server time: 18:37:57 on 19/6/2019
2. Server time: 12:59:29 on 20/6/2019
3. Server time: 14:15:42 on 20/6/2019

Related points:

References:

http://opinion.tvhobo.com/owenjones_israel_numberwang.html

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Simple text version.

"The complexity of language which you have to learn when you learn a language is almost entirely externalisation" (Chomsky).

In that nutshell (read a longer extract concerning the matter via the link in the references below, and references on that link) lies the problem with the so-called 'west' today.

The reason idiots like, for example, Alistair Campbell or Robert Webb or Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton are 'up themselves', (a list of 10,000 people could be made right here right now, but why? You can extrapolate) is that they have been taught to see the complexity of communicated/external language as a great evolutionary trait, and to measure their own 'worth' and 'survivability' in terms of their capacity to learn by rote all sorts of theoretically needlessly complex forms.

There must be a hundred different ways in which I can try to explain that problem without there being at least a majority of readers who still do not get it.

Read the Chomsky. That's the best way to be sure you may manage to comprehend the real nature of the organisation of your mind.

I was reading through what I wrote about the 'numberwangers' earlier and noticed this: << How much of the media, of big companies, and small ones, of the people you meet everywhere, important and unimportant, onscreen and off it, are not actually mediocre when it comes to their capacity to be intelligent, to be honest, to be diligent, to be thorough, to be on the case like Rumpole, to be facing the truth like the Pythons, to be true to the spirit like Briers and Kendall and Eddington and Keith? How many of them are, instead, in fact, weak minded, weak willed, servants of narcissism and any tyrant who can open a door for them to some comfort? >>

In fact it is me, more than 99% or 100% of readers who can understand what I'm saying there. If you ARE mediocre you have nothing to measure by and do not know you are mediocre. The nature of the document as, primarily, self-communication, before any other form of communication, says much about reality which most of you miss.

On top of everything else it says this: that if you are truly 'enlightened' then your chief audience is yourself, so your object is only ever to disseminate truth in total correspondence to all internal organisation of your mind. You are "intellectually honest".

Thus anyone who takes as an a priori the need for 'p.r.' and basic dishonesty, of any sort, most of the time - is tending away from evolved, not in the direction of evolution.

This is the majority of humans in our times. The misunderstanding over language which the Chomsky quotes draw attention to is key to you, reader, if you want to be one of the ones to evolve, asap.



http://opinion.tvhobo.com/owenjones_israel_numberwang.html