Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Low and high cancer risks?   Share:  
Thrust of argument: Is the future of society a better place, upwardly mobile? Or downhill towards extinction? Direction of resistance / implied resistance: So many products and services and events and lifestyles are very cancer-causing but hardly any are legally touted as such, yet.

 

Read about a low-risk "end of day" trading method designed for long and stable periods of economic activity.

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: In time the harm will be fully recognised by officialdom, there are only delays, there is no real way to stop the recognition coming. The deaths are mounting. These are sadly what humanity is waiting for before properly policing the cancer causers. Unification: If we get in a rut, our cities will advertise 'low cancer risk' to us as an advantage, whether in products, locations or jobs.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 14:35:17 on 14/2/2018

Related points:

References:

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22