Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

Workers' rights are priority.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: Work is the right to own the business you work for. Direction of resistance / implied resistance: That is what work is in this day and age.

 

I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 472.00 bt AT APPROX 237.00 capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 179.35 hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 469.70 icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 609.00 sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 699.40 standardlife AT APPROX 392.00 taylorwimpey AT APPROX 190.40 vodafone AT APPROX 203.00

THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: Unions have been (and continue to be) part of the journey bringing us (despite hindrances and Thatcherism and Reaganism) to where we are today. Unification: Workers - you should own the company you work for. It does not matter which company. And don't let them con you with pretences of ownership. You must own it outright, between all workers, and you must have a complete say in what it does and how you work, ALWAYS. That is the modern day. Those who rebel against it will come to be known as 'criminals'. Not long now. Work hard. And own what you do.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 11:47:18 on 13/2/2018

Related points:

References:

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22