NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".
Israel vs USA.
Thrust of argument: John V Walsh points out 'The U.S. policy in the Middle East is a spectacular success for Israel even though it is disastrous for U.S, ambitions as unchallenged global hegemon. Israel's adversaries, Iraq, Syria and Libya lie in ruins. And the hatred in the Muslim world that has arisen from these ashes is directed at the U.S.'
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Walsh points out that 'the U.S. has quickened the mutual embrace of China and Russia by engineering an anti-Russian coup in Ukraine.'
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 468.90
bt AT APPROX 231.65
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 170.25
hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 465.60
icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 612.40
m&s AT APPROX 297.50
pearson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 696.20
sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 701.20
standardlife AT APPROX 380.60
taylorwimpey AT APPROX 189.90
vodafone AT APPROX 200.90
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: Walsh portrays the U.S. as being like one of those characters in the Brer Rabbit stories - and sees the U.S. as being tangled up in a 'tar baby'.
Unification: Walsh warns all the jingoistic 'patriotic' racists that 'That said, we must recognize the criminality of the situation and the barabaric nature of Israelís designs. The peoples of the Middle East are absorbing enormous blows from the U.S. economic and military machine in the form of wars and economic sanctions. More suffering will follow. Is it any surprise that the likes of ISIS have arisen?'.
(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns)
previous point on the grid | next point on the grid
Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.
Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22