NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".
Chelsea Bradley Ed Julian.
Thrust of argument: Charles Glass writes 'Three people who recently expanded our knowledge of how repression works and gave ammunition for protest paid with the loss of their freedom. Chelsea, then Bradley, Manning was sentenced to thirty-five years in prison for passing documents on America's wars to Wikileaks. Julian Assange, the Wikileaks founder, has been under legal confinement for four years, first restricted on bail to a farm in Norfolk and subsequently under political asylum in Ecuador's embassy in London, without a single charge lodged against him. Edward Snowden, who exposed the National Security Agency's policy of universal electronic surveillance in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, found refuge in a Russia and is unable to travel'.
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Manning, Assange and Snowden have stood up on behalf of billions of humans, to the horrific face of corporate power.
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 468.90
bt AT APPROX 231.65
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 170.25
hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 465.60
icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 612.40
m&s AT APPROX 297.50
pearson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 696.20
sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 701.20
standardlife AT APPROX 380.60
taylorwimpey AT APPROX 189.90
vodafone AT APPROX 200.90
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: Others have too.
Unification: And many more will do so. It will never be left unchallenged and it will be faced until it is defeated.
(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns)
previous point on the grid | next point on the grid
Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.
Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22