Home   |   Browse       NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".

As the exceptional dogs of war, inequality and divide and rule keep barking, the China-Russia pan-Eurasian caravan will keep going, going, going further on down the (multipolar) road.   Share:  
Thrust of argument: Pepe Escobar explains 'When Little Dubya Bush came to power in early 2001, the neo-cons were faced with a stark fact: it was just a matter of time before the US would irreversibly lose its global geopolitical and economic hegemony. So there were only two choices; either manage the decline, or bet the whole farm to consolidate global hegemony using what else war. We all know about the wishful thinking enveloping the 'low-cost' war on Iraq from Paul Wolfowitz's 'We are the new OPEC' to the fantasy of Washington being able to decisively intimidate all potential challengers, the EU, Russia and China.' Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Unity among the EU, Russia and China and Middle East and Asia can challenge the corporate-powered planet-destroying status quo.

 

Read about a low-risk "end of day" trading method designed for long and stable periods of economic activity.

 

Enter your DOMAIN NAME to
collect this point:

 

Removal of resistance: Give it strength. Unification: Unify with it, whoever you are.
Rebut this point   Support this point   Edit this point

(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns

 

Copy/paste point into your work:

Type: Open statement

1 versions:

1. Server time: 15:4:7 on 11/2/2018

Related points:

References:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/11/14/chinas-silky-road-to-glory/

 

 

previous point on the grid   |   next point on the grid

 

Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.

Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22