NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".
Chomsky to Charlies!
Thrust of argument: Noam Chomsky writes 'These quotes, as the indefatigable David Peterson reminds us, are not, however, from January 2015. Rather, they are from a story of Erlanger's on April 24 1999, which made it only to page 6 of the New York Times, not reaching the significance of the Charlie Hebdo attack. Erlanger was reporting on the NATO (meaning US) 'missile attack on Serbian state television headquarters' that 'knocked Radio Television Serbia off the air'.'
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: Chomsky compares a New York Times' reporter's coverage of two separate massacres of journalists - the famous 'Charlie Hebdo affair' and the not so famous killing of Serbian journalists by NATO missiles.
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 472.00
bt AT APPROX 237.00
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 179.35
hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 469.70
icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 609.00
sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 699.40
standardlife AT APPROX 392.00
taylorwimpey AT APPROX 190.40
vodafone AT APPROX 203.00
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: Chomsky also points out 'We might recall as well that this is only one of many assaults by the Righteous on free expression. To mention only one example that is easily erased from 'living memory,' the assault on Falluja by US forces in November 2004, one of the worst crimes of the invasion of Iraq, opened with occupation of Falluja General Hospital.'
Unification: Please do read the full article via the link in the references below to Noam Chomsky's own website. Thanks.
(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns)
previous point on the grid | next point on the grid
Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.
Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22