NEW: (hypothetically starring) VIC REEVES as LUKE SKYWALKER .. in "Waiting for Godot, the hollywood version".
Hezbollah and Iran protect Israeli children against ISIS whilst Israeli government plays dangerous games and gives ISIS succour.
Thrust of argument: Xinhua writes 'As many as 5,000 fighters of the Lebanese Hezbollah backed by Iranian and Syrian fighters are spearheading the current battles against the rebels in southern Syria, close to the borders with the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, a monitoring group reported Saturday'.
Direction of resistance / implied resistance: The majority of Chinese people are being told that 'Syrian analysts said the aim of the battle is to thwart what they called 'Israel plan' to impose a buffer zone using the anti-Syrian government militants in that part of Syria, akin to what it had done during the Lebanese Civil War, when the Israelis used Israeli-backed Lebanese militants to protect its borders with Lebanon.'
I WOULD TRADE NOW ON:
bp AT APPROX 468.90
bt AT APPROX 231.65
capita (at half strength)
AT APPROX 170.25
hammerson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 465.60
icag (at half strength)
AT APPROX 612.40
m&s AT APPROX 297.50
pearson (at half strength)
AT APPROX 696.20
sage (at half strength)
AT APPROX 701.20
standardlife AT APPROX 380.60
taylorwimpey AT APPROX 189.90
vodafone AT APPROX 200.90
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE. CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.
Removal of resistance: That doesn't seem to be wrong of the Syrian analysts. Their claims sound very credible and no doubt research into this will show exactly what backs the claims up.
Unification: Fortunately only 'westerners' are kept in the dark about this, on the whole. Much of the rest of the planet is 'on the case'.
(TVhobo's estimated size of readership since 2013, mainly in the UK and USA, with Germany in third place:
over 200,000 readers across approximately 200 cities/towns)
previous point on the grid | next point on the grid
Click here to read about Shams Pirani, the editor and chief author on this grid - note, if you can actually prove anything written above wrong, I would gladly, if the proof is sufficient, correct what I've written and what I think - if I could, however, prove your attempted proof wrong, then I would accordingly say so and maintain whatever point of view is completely based on fact and proof.
Browse the index: 1 | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22